1. News
  2. Releases
  3. TypeSafe · AI models
ReleaseTypeSafe · AI models2 min read

New AI model answers with odds, not text, and claims 100x lower cost

A new AI model called Jev returns a probability score instead of text. Its maker says that makes sorting tasks far cheaper, though the claim needs checking.

By the Dashline deskSource: TechJuice
New AI model answers with odds, not text, and claims 100x lower cost
Photo: Alphaaloy, CC BY-SA 4.0

A new AI model called Jev does not write answers. It returns a number between 0 and 1. A score of 0.9 means a 90% chance the answer is yes. Its maker, TypeSafe AI, says that approach makes it about 100 times cheaper than comparable models for sorting tasks.

What Jev does

You ask a yes or no question, such as "Is this customer angry?" Jev replies with a score like 0.9. Software can act on that number without a person reading anything. TypeSafe built Jev for automation and classification, which means sorting items such as emails or reviews into groups.

TypeSafe launched Jev on September 18. Founder Diogo Almeida started the company two years ago after working on ChatGPT at OpenAI. He concluded that chatbots are built for human-readable language, while computers need clear, structured results.

Why it is said to be cheaper

Chatbots mostly charge for the text they write, counted in tokens, which are small chunks of words. Jev outputs a number, so it charges by the billion input tokens instead. TypeSafe also says Jev cannot make things up, because it produces numbers rather than sentences. That is the company's claim. A number can still be wrong.

What early testers found

  • Vercel engineer Pranit Sharma tested Jev against OpenAI's Luna model and found it 5 to 18 times faster with better accuracy.
  • Nikhil Mudholkar, CTO of Bryo AI, compared Jev with Gemini for sorting business emails and found it 10 to 20 times cheaper.
  • Demand after launch was so high that it overwhelmed TypeSafe's infrastructure.

These are individual tests. The 10 to 20 times figure from Mudholkar is well below the 100 times the company claims.

Who it is for

Jev targets businesses that run high volumes of repetitive checks, like flagging angry customers or routing emails. Costs matter there. The report notes a 625x price gap between the cheapest usable option, at $0.04 per million output tokens, and top models at $25. It also cites RaftLabs, which puts custom AI automation at $30,000 to $120,000 for 3 to 10 workflows, plus $500 to $8,000 a month to run.

What is not known yet

The report does not give Jev's actual price list. It also offers no independent testing across many kinds of work. TypeSafe says Jev was trained only on synthetic data, meaning examples generated by computers. How that affects accuracy on your own messages is untested. Any business tempted by the savings should try Jev on its own data first.

The takeaway

Jev scores yes or no questions with a probability and may cut sorting costs, but test it on your own emails or reviews before trusting the savings.

More articles

You should really read these.

Next step

Let’s talk