1. News
  2. AI models & agents
  3. Music · AI law
Music · AI law1 min read

Music industry's top lawyer and a tech editor agree on AI's big problem

The head of the RIAA and a tech journalist, once on opposite sides of the Napster fight, now share the same complaint about AI companies.

By the Dashline deskSource: The Verge
Music industry's top lawyer and a tech editor agree on AI's big problem
Photo: The Verge

Mitch Glazier, CEO and chairman of the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), sat down with the host of The Verge's Decoder podcast. The two have a history. The host was in college when Napster hit and later defended kids sued over music downloads. Glazier was a young RIAA lawyer working on those cases. Now they agree on something.

What they agree on

According to the host, the RIAA, record labels, artists and ordinary people are all unhappy with big AI companies in the same way. The complaints are that the companies train on everyone's work without permission and flood feeds with low-quality AI content, often called slop.

What the talk covers

  • AI deepfakes, and how banning them could affect other kinds of expression
  • How AI detection and labeling systems might work in practice
  • What happens if big platforms like Spotify and YouTube do not get on board

The RIAA both lobbies for changes to the law and files lawsuits on behalf of record labels and distributors, so its view carries weight.

What is not known yet

The published excerpt cuts off before Glazier's answers. It does not say what rules he wants, whether any labeling plan exists, or whether Spotify or YouTube would agree to one. Those details are in the full episode.

The takeaway

Music's top trade group and critics of its Napster-era lawsuits now share a complaint about AI, and labeling rules could change what shows up on Spotify and YouTube.

More articles

You should really read these.

Next step

Let’s talk