Top House Democrats told a court they side with publishers in the New York Times lawsuit against OpenAI, a case that could decide if AI firms must pay for content.
Top Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee have sided with publishers in a copyright fight with OpenAI. They shared their view in a court filing. The lawsuit is led by The New York Times. The move also criticizes the Justice Department, which has backed OpenAI in the case.
The case asks a basic question. Can AI companies use published work without paying for it? OpenAI is an AI company. Publishers say their articles and other work have value and should not be used for free. The answer could shape how AI tools get built and who gets paid along the way.
The filing matters because it shows lawmakers taking sides in a court fight. It also shows the federal government is not speaking with one voice. Justice Department support for OpenAI and Democratic support for publishers point in opposite directions.
The material does not say how the court will treat the filing or when a ruling might come. It also does not spell out the Justice Department's exact arguments. For now, this is a sign of where the political debate is heading, not a decision.
A court case may soon decide if AI firms can use published work for free, and the answer could matter to anyone who makes or relies on content.
A Kuala Lumpur firm now sells a SGD 1,500 check of what ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google say about a named executive, after its founder's own test found mix-ups.
Read more: New Audit Checks What AI Chatbots Say About Business LeadersWorld models, AI that learns physics from video, are being built into home robots and driverless cars, and your own videos may help train them.
Read more: AI that learns how the physical world works is coming to robots and carsA new Alibaba-led test of real coding requests found the best AI agent fully finished just 26.4 percent of tasks, so human review still matters.
Read more: AI coding helpers fully finish only about 1 in 4 real tasks
