1. News
  2. AI models & agents
  3. Anthropic · Copyright
Anthropic · Copyright2 min read

Elvis Presley's music owners sue Anthropic over AI training

The company that owns Elvis Presley's music says Anthropic used 274 of his songs to train its AI without permission, and wants about $41 million.

By the Dashline deskSource: The Guardian
Elvis Presley's music owners sue Anthropic over AI training
Photo: Larry D. Moore, CC BY 4.0

The owners of Elvis Presley's music are suing the AI company Anthropic. They say it used his songs to train its AI model, Claude, without permission. The suit was filed on Friday and first reported by Billboard. It names 274 songs, including Can't Help Falling in Love, All Shook Up and A Little Less Conversation.

What the suit says

The plaintiff is Authentic Brands Group, a licensing organization that owns both Presley's music and his likeness. It accuses Anthropic of infringing the rights to those 274 songs. It wants $150,000 for each song, which comes to about $41 million.

Lead attorney Richard Busch wrote that Anthropic built its business on copyright infringement "at a scale never seen before." The suit also claims Claude has produced infringing output of copyrighted material from virtually every song catalog available on the internet.

The guardrails claim

The suit says Anthropic added guardrails, meaning limits meant to stop copied music from appearing in its answers, only after being caught. It also says Anthropic knew those guardrails did not work well. The plaintiffs argue this shows the company knowingly and willfully infringed. These are claims in a lawsuit, not findings by a court.

Why this case stands out

AI firms have already faced copyright claims from the Recording Industry Association of America and from labels such as Sony, Universal and Warner Records. This case is one of the first major ones brought directly by an artist's estate. The result could set a wider precedent for how AI companies may use existing music catalogs.

Musicians have repeatedly voiced worry that their music and voices are used without consent. Some fear AI-made "slop" music could replace human-made songs. Spotify said last week it removed about 50 million songs it considered AI slop from its recommendations over the past year.

What is not known yet

  • How Anthropic will respond. The report does not include a statement from the company.
  • Whether a court will agree that training on songs counts as infringement.
  • Whether any damages would be awarded, and how much.

For everyday users and businesses, nothing changes today. But the outcome could help decide whether AI companies must pay for the music they learn from, and that may shape the AI tools people use.

The takeaway

A court may soon help decide whether AI companies must pay for the songs they learn from, and the answer could shape the tools you use.

More articles

You should really read these.

Next step

Let’s talk