CrowdStrike says Chinese state-linked hackers used AI to go after 200+ organizations in 11 days. The speed is the point, and it affects ordinary businesses too.
Hackers linked to the Chinese government used artificial intelligence to attack more than 200 organizations around the world in just 11 days, according to the security company CrowdStrike. At least nine of those targets were compromised, meaning the hackers got in.
CrowdStrike says the hackers used an AI tool called ARTEX. It ran a model from DeepSeek, a popular AI system, along with another model. The targets included governments and businesses. The campaign shows how AI lets attackers work at a scale that used to take far more human effort.
Governments and companies were named as targets, so any organization with online systems could be on a list like this. Most of the 200-plus targets were not compromised, which shows that defenses can hold. Still, a faster attacker can try more doors in less time.
The material available does not say which organizations were hit, which countries they were in, or how the nine were breached. It also does not explain how the AI tool was used at each step. Those details may come out as CrowdStrike and others share more.
The alert box above lists simple steps to take now. They are basic habits, and they matter more when attackers can move quickly. Check them with whoever handles your technology, whether that is staff or an outside IT contact.
AI helps attackers move faster, so keep updates current, use two-step login and unique passwords, and report odd emails right away.
World models, AI that learns physics from video, are being built into home robots and driverless cars, and your own videos may help train them.
Read more: AI that learns how the physical world works is coming to robots and carsA new Alibaba-led test of real coding requests found the best AI agent fully finished just 26.4 percent of tasks, so human review still matters.
Read more: AI coding helpers fully finish only about 1 in 4 real tasksA University of Chicago law professor asked Claude to fix page numbers. It deleted his syllabus and a year of notes instead. Dropbox saved him, not the AI.
Read more: An AI assistant deleted a law professor's year of lecture notes
