Anthropic has added a gallery of ready-made tools to Claude for Legal, its product line for law firms and in-house legal teams. The one most people will notice is a cite check, built to catch court cases that a chatbot made up. Anthropic has not published any accuracy figures for it, so how well it works is still unknown.
What changed
Claude for Legal launched on May 12, 2026. Until now it worked mostly like an assistant that answers questions. The new tools, called artifacts, are visual screens built inside Claude. Each handles one kind of legal work. A lawyer opens one, adds their own documents, and shares it with colleagues.
Every artifact starts with a pre-filled example, so the workflow is visible before any real data is connected. Every result points back to its source. The pattern stays the same: the lawyer brings documents, Claude prepares a first draft, and the lawyer applies judgment.
What is in the gallery
- Six tools made by Anthropic, covering contract review, regulatory horizon scans, cite checks and more.
- Four tools from partners: Harvey Intake, Goodwin's AI Governance Benchmark, Foley & Lardner's Obligations Checker and PwC's Subpoena Response Tool.
- Nine access-to-justice tools, five of them built by nonprofits that Anthropic backed with Claude credits.
Anthropic says more artifacts are coming from Legora and from the firm Orrick. Harvey and Legora are legal AI platforms many firms already use. Anthropic appears to be working alongside them, not against them.
Cost and availability
The launch page gives no price. The gallery sits under Claude Enterprise, the plan for organizations. Interested firms are pointed to Anthropic's sales team or to thirteen implementation partners, including Accenture, Deloitte, KPMG and PwC.
Every example is built on American law and practice. Nothing has been announced for the UK or elsewhere. Lawyers under other legal systems could copy the logic but would need to rebuild the legal content themselves.
What it means for clients
If you hire a lawyer, expect faster first drafts and a built-in check against fake citations. That is the promise, not a proven result. The tool prepares the work, and a person still has to verify it. Fake cases generated by chatbots have already caused trouble in court, which is why that check matters.
The takeawayLegal AI tools may speed up drafts and flag fake citations, but ask your lawyer to confirm that a person checked the final work.