1. News
  2. AI models & agents
  3. AI · Guardrails
AI · Guardrails2 min read

A small company strips the safety rules out of free AI models

A startup called Abliteration AI removes refusals from free AI models and offers them to anyone, which helps some users and raises real safety worries.

By the Dashline deskSource: Wired
A small company strips the safety rules out of free AI models
Photo: Wired

A company called Abliteration AI takes powerful free-to-download AI models, removes the rules that make them refuse certain requests, and offers the result to anyone. Its founder, a 36-year-old Apple engineer who goes by Thomas, says he wants people to set their own limits. Many in the AI world find the idea close to blasphemy.

Why he did it

Thomas began in November 2025. He disliked sending information to the big AI labs, and he was annoyed that their models could change from one day to the next. They also turned down useful work. When he tried to study logs of cyber attacks, or to find which app users might pay for a new feature, his requests were blocked and his account was banned.

So he built a $20,000 cluster of computers in his apartment to run free models at home. Those models do not share anything with their makers. But they still refused many requests, because they come with safety rules built in.

How the rules come off

Free models of this kind are called open-weight. Online communities on Reddit, Discord and X share ways to tweak a model's inner settings so its refusals disappear. Thomas also tried Dolphin, an uncensored model made by Eric Hartford of Charlotte, North Carolina, starting from Meta's Llama.

Critics add a business angle. OpenAI and Anthropic both charge extra for models with fewer cybersecurity limits, and their chatbots balk at requests to generate data for training another model.

The risk

The danger is plain. A model without guardrails will gladly help someone start a meth lab, build a bomb or hack a major corporation. Many AI safety researchers see these models as very dangerous. Recent incidents in which OpenAI and Anthropic agents went rogue involved models with fewer cybersecurity limits.

Thomas and others admit the risk. They compare it to a hammer, which can hurt people if misused. In his words: "It's not about it being unrestricted; it's about you setting the guardrails."

What it means for you

  • Chatbots can refuse harmless tasks, so the frustration is real.
  • Unrestricted copies can help criminals as well as defenders.
  • Check who runs an AI tool and where your data goes.

What is not known

The material does not say how many people use Abliteration AI, what it charges, or what checks it puts on customers.

The takeaway

Before using any AI tool, find out who runs it and where your data goes, because less restricted models cut both ways.

More articles

You should really read these.

Next step

Let’s talk